Well, Wdg3rd. Now we're going to have to stone you for sexual immorality...
Just as soon as we can scare up someone to start us off...
Anyone?...
Sean (I like it when the name is spelled right, I know too many guys named Shawn), anybody is welcome to try to stone me. I shoot back, with no respect for whatever reason they're throwing the rocks.
I would be the first ... but the sin from my hands are making it difficult
but were to start 
1- Well I have not experience of about sexual ''uncommon'' activities, so I can't say if Guy will survive double team or any thing else ...
You're young (I assume -- because anybody with a Y chromosome who has survived in a country with over half a century of civil war is either too young to draft or too old to care.
2- I believe that with a government or not, there will be religions, people getting married and some may even get married with more than one person. Marriage is not only about sex, it is about trust and kids, when someone get a kid from an extra-marital relationship, he may ended unintentional be de facto husband of two women ... which has nothing to do with sleeping with both at the same time.
Of course. Any and all of the above. For instance, while I have occasionally committed what some folks call adultery and some religions consider a sin, I have never "cheated" on a spouse. All was approved in advance. And I have approved of all of the extramarital affairs of my various spouses except for the one my co-husband used to break up our previously comfortable open polyandry. (I'm comfortable that every woman I've been married to has good taste, and won't bring anything home that requires intervention by antibiotics). Yeah, there has been one I won't allow to eat at my table after the first time, but that's because he insulted my cooking, not my wife. (Rat couldn't handle spices even a Russian would enjoy). She didn't invite him back.
I tend not to buy the ''extensive version'' of libertarianism : Freedom from the government, religion and moral ...
A libertarian society will be some kind of extremely libertine, atheist and amoral ... nor all will get Ayn Rand style ''objectivity''
I am of the extreme libertarian side. Do whatever you want to as long as you don't initiate force or fraud. You can be libertine or cloistered, atheist or sacrifice any nonsapient beast or bird to whatever god you want to, fuck like a bunny or be celibate. Yes, I'm amoral. I have no morals (which I consider to be rules externally imposed). I am as ethical as you can find, because the Zero Aggression Principle is the one law I live by. It is my mantra. Don't mess with me, I won't mess with you -- but if you mess with me or mine you're food for the buzzards. I'm not an objectivist, however much I love and reread Ayn Rand's works (I first read _Anthem_ when in the sixth grade, when I was eleven years old, the year the original Star Trek series was first broadcast. The next year I read _The Fountainhead_ and in the 8th grade I read _Atlas Shrugged_. In junior high (called middle school in some places) they look at you funny when you're carrying around a 1027 page book that doesn't even have any pictures in it). But I have no choice but to live subjectively because as a mathematics/philosophy scholar I can only see the world through my own eyes.
This vision of ''liberty'' is not only superfluous, but it is also useless and counter-productive since it give the impression that all anarchist Shall be : atheist, sexual libertin, pro-abortion and ''open-minded'' ie : Having no moral whatsoever.
Wrong. I know many deeply religious anarchists (no, I don't know how they internally reconcile their feelings, being an atheist myself), libertine (I'm really not, as I explained above) and monastic, and the abortion debate is out of my turf, I had a vasectomy. I'm very "open-minded", I have no morals, but I live by the one supreme ethical rule: Thou shalt not initiate force.
I remember one of EFT strip presented King church has being something like ''not very religious'', and still don't know if the point was simply to make fun of religion or only try to say that anarchism will ''free peoples religious feelings''.
It means, live as you wish, worship as you wish (I doubt that Reg King operates the only church in Ceres), and love as you wish.
A book I recommend to you (and to anybody around who hasn't read it) is _The Rainbow Cadenza_ by J. Neil Schulman. Possibly has some of the best dialogue on the conflict that need not happen between atheists and believers.
Is EFT making an anti-religious point ?
Not that I can see. There are of course folks who take it on faith that any venture by Man to ascend unto the heavens under his own power is blasphemy. And I doubt that either Sandy or Scott are regular church-goers, but I could be wrong. But don't make assumptions that anybody is anti-religious or not from their artwork.
_I_ proudly proclaim myself to be anti-religion. I'm not merely atheist as a non-believer: if there is a G-D, I'm opposed. On Judgment Day, I intend to be either in the jury or at the prosecution bench, because that omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent bastard has a lot of crimes to answer to.